|
by Tejal Rao
May 2007
Classically, the grand hotel
restaurant was owned by its hotel, its name synonymous with the
hotel’s, if not identical. But as the relationship between
hotel restaurant and hotel evolved, so did the deal structure. Hotels
eager to turn a profit, or update their image, employed little tactics
like adding a street entrance to be more accessible to non-guests,
or starting an entertainment-focused
restaurant to draw a crowd. But little tactics can only go so
far in competing with stand-alone, chef-driven restaurants where
the diner makes a personal connection with the chef.
Bob Amick of Concentrics Hospitality, who most
recently consulted on the Lobby at Hotel Twelve project,
explains why hotels are playing the concept game: “Hotel restaurants
have recently realized that they have to compete with free standing
restaurants. Now hotels are emphasizing their restaurants and hotels
by 'concept-ing' their restaurant or by bringing in high profile
restaurateurs to 'concept' the restaurant. Hotels are bringing destination
dining into the hotel by bringing in a restaurant and becoming a
destination place to eat.”
Think of hotels as the Midwest of the culinary landscape –
trends take a little longer to catch on. If we define concept-branded
restaurants as chef branded restaurants, this is not a particularly
new thing (Ducasse, Robuchon, Nobu, etc.). But in hotels, the concept
restaurant is just starting to take off. Here’s how:
The management/licensing deal where the operator
acts as manager:
In this deal the chef can get anywhere between 4-7% of the gross
revenue. Often when the restaurant is not performing to expectations
and the chef isn’t around, the operator becomes disenchanted
with the chef. A lack of understanding of each others’ roles,
or expectations, makes for a bad situation. The developer will often
move to terminate the relationship, ie ditch the chef.
The tenant/partnering deal where they share equity:
In this deal the chef is more intimately involved. The equity can
range from 30-50% for the chef, depending on how much money he puts
up in the beginning. The management fee will be between 3-6% (which
the chef also gets in the management deal above). Once the capital
is repaid to the investors then the profits are split based on the
equity share and the operator can start to see some profit. But
during the repayment of the capital, the chef still gets the management
fee. That’s the incentive for the chef to stay involved, ie
see the big picture as an investor and as a chef.
Adam Block, Principal of Block & Associates,
discusses the concept: “Today chefs are diversifying their
roles by being in many places, or lending a brand. What hotel owners
and developers really care about is employing a good operator, not
so much about whether the chef is there. You could almost say the
concept being delivered by the chef is more important than the chef
himself.”
Let’s play restaurant word association. Craft…Tom
Colicchio. L’Atelier…Joel Robuchon. Spice
Market…Jean-Georges. See, it’s easy. When a restaurant
lodges itself so deeply into our culinary subconscious that it becomes
synonymous with a chef’s name, the chef is successful. When
a brand is managed so well that its chef can personalize the concept
without negotiating their vision or the vision of their financial
partner, everyone wins.
It’s a rare and delicate symbiotic relationship between restaurant,
hotel, owner, and management, but Craft, Dallas is proof
that it’s possible. Kevin Maxey, Shannon Swindle, Aaron Rodonis
and Justin Beam run the cuisine, pastry, wine and cocktail programs,
and they run them well by applying their personal visions, respectively.
Colicchio’s vision is still carried through, with a build-your-own
ingredient-focused menu and East London industrial design, and so
is the W Hotel’s. An art installation on the wall reminds
you’re in a slick W; its hanging plastic horses and cowboys
remind you you’re in Dallas – there’s nothing
impersonal or anonymous about the concept, duplicated as it is across
the country. Enter through the W’s ultra-modern white lobby
or the velvet curtained door on the street, either way the experience
will not be the disjointed one you’d expect at the conceptual
juncture of two mega-empires.
|